November 2, 2008

Living in a racist, redneck wonderland

Well I’ve been thinking about what to say about this, and phrases like “travesty of justice” and “racist, redneck state” spring to mind. This week indigenous man Lex Wotton will be sentenced for his alleged part in the 2004 riot and subsequent arson of the Palm Island police station and court house after the death of Mulrindji Doomagee at police hands. Wotton faces up to 25 years for an incident in which no one was injured.

So where is Senior Sargeant Chris Hurley, the policeman charged with splitting Mulrinji’s liver in two before he died?  Hurley was in 2007 acquitted by a jury of his peers. No jury of his peers for Wotton, his jury was white as snow.

Was Hurley punished, demoted or otherwise suffer for the murder of Mulrinji? Today Hurley has a cushy job, a promotion compared to his Palm island posting.  In 2007 he received $100,000 compensation.

On Monday he and 21 other officers involved in the riot received bravery awards. Mayor of Palm Island, Alf Lacey, says this sets back indigenous-police relations a decade. He says the timing of the awards is offensive.

“It seems quite clear that they’re trying to send a message to Palm Island and to Aboriginal people in general in Queensland that we’re it and we’re the winners and things like that,” he told the ABC.

Queensland State Parliament Speaker Mike Reynolds, the Member for Townsville, called for the awards to be postponed, saying Police Commissioner Bob Atkinson was being purposely provocative. Reynolds was one of the few political supporters of the rioters. On October 25 Reynolds accused the QLD police union of a vendetta against him.

During the trial, Wotton was hospitalised for shock. Police were accussed of lying under oath. Wotton’s lawyer Clive Steirn said that evidence would show several police witnesses have lied under oath about his client’s alleged part in the riot, in particular Detective Sergeant Darryn Robinson. Robinson had previously admitted to lying during the Hurley investigation.  Steirn says Robinson wanted Wotton to pay for what happened to his friend Hurley.

In March demands were made for the trial judge, Milton Griffin, to disqualify himself over comments he made about Wotton during the trial of four other men charged with rioting on Palm Is.

On Saturday, November 1, hundreds of people turned out in a solidarity march for Wotton in Brisbane. More protests continue this week with a mass rally called for Friday, the day of Wotton’s sentencing, outside Brisbane Police Headquarters.

Read also:

http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2005/11/99890.php
http://melbourne.indymedia.org/news/2007/01/137879.php
http://andrewbartlett.com/?p=7143

Blogged with the Flock Browser

October 19, 2008

What you need to know to do radio

Today I’m training new volunteers at 4ZzZfm102.1fm in Brisbane.  What follows is my advice to anyone interested in getting involved in Radical Radio at Zed.

1. Intro to the Rad Radio concept

The Rad Radio collective formed in 2002. Originally conisting of interchangable hosts of the Anarchy Show, EcoRadio and Radio Democracy, in 2006 Locked In & Megaherz joined us and in 2008 the DIY show ‘Scissors, Paper, Glue’.  Many of the Rad Radio shows have a long history at Zed, running for over two decades.

The RR shows share content and have similar world views. We also provide our interviews and other recorded matter for the Zed Newsroom to use, meaning a potential six shows a week may use our research and we may reach as many as 60,000 listeners as a result.

RANT:

Democratic media is the backbone of a democratic society. In our current society, media is controlled by individual capitalists and corporations who make up our societies elite. This is directly due to their control and power over societies’ resources or capital.

In relation to the media, control over the resources required to create media is increasingly being monopolised in the hands of a few corporations. They then have the power to control what type of media content is produced. Essentially this means that they have control over what ideas the rest of the community is exposed to. Control over ideas is the most effective method of social control. It means that the majority of people don’t realise what their interests are, seeing they are rarely voiced, and are incapacitated to take action on them.

All corporate media is oriented towards one overriding goal: the business interests of the owner. All other considerations are secondary, including their responsibility and role of honestly informing the public, to facilitate open, public discourse. This role is critical for a dynamic and healthy democratic society, but is necessarily considered after the need for profits.

The corporate media have a product: you the audience, whom they sell to corporations who want to expose you to advertising. The corporate media’s real customers are other corporations, who are sold the opportunity to expose the audience to their propaganda, otherwise known as advertising.

Regardless of the content, this corporate propaganda always promotes a consumerist culture above all other democratic and egalitarian values and processes. No one is immune. Successful indoctrination requires you to be unaware of it.

Here lies the importance of media activism. The process allows people within a community the opportunity to create alternative forms of media to reclaim democratic impulses and expressions. It is the ability to prevent our lives, our ideas, our communities being co-opted by corporate domination.

The forms of media activism are diverse. It is putting up a poster on a wall, creating a zine, or flyer, it is community radio, community TV, Indymedia and culture jamming. It can be painting on your car, t-shirt, or on an empty wall. It is making and sharing your own music, art, literature, video; or a simple as using your own mouth whenever you can. It is as much about creating and maintaining the resources to produce and distribute media, as it is about creating the content that tells a different story.

Regardless of the form of the media, the processes of media activism should be about self-empowerment that informs, entertains or connects others in the community. It should not be driven by the ‘profit motive’ or recreate hierarchies of power and domination. Anyone can do it. There are no rules, just values. The way we organise and live, is just as important as the message we spread. A Brave New World is here. Just turn on the TV news to see it. There is no way to buy ourselves out of this.

Radical Radio exists to further Zed’s motto: “Agitate, Educate, Organise!”

2. Attention all Community Radio Broadcasters: Codes of Practice

A community radio broadcasts are governed by the communtiy Broadcasting Codes of Practice 1-8. they can be found here: http://www.cbaa.org.au/content.php/20.html

Guiding Principles of the CB COP:

There are a number of general principles that unite all community broadcasters across Australia. In pursuing these principles stations endeavour to:

  1. Promote harmony and diversity in contributing to a cohesive, inclusive and culturally diverse Australian community;

  2. Pursue the principles of democracy, access and equity, especially to people and issues under-represented in other media;

  3. Enhance the diversity of programming choices available to the public and present programs which expand the variety of viewpoints broadcast in Australia;

  4. Demonstrate independence in their programming as well as in their editorial and management decisions;

  5. Support and develop local and Australian arts, music and culture in the station’s programming, to reflect a sense of Australian identity, character and cultural diversity;

  6. Widen the community’s involvement in broadcasting.

Other points of note include:

  1. Requirement to include a ‘language warning’ before any recordings that contain swearing

  2. Do not incite violence, or present it for entertainment value

  3. Present as desirable the misuse of drugs including alcohol, narcotics and tobacco

  4. Stereotype, incite, vilify, or perpetuate hatred against, or attempt to demean any person or group on the basis of ethnicity, nationality, race, chosen language, gender, sexual preference, religion, age, physical or mental ability, occupation, cultural belief or political affiliation

  5. Seek to involve and take advice from Indigenous Australians, and where possible Indigenous media organisations and/or Indigenous broadcasters, in the production of programs focusing on Indigenous people and issues

  6. Avoid censorship wherever possible

It also provides for music content rules that include a quota of not less than 25% Australian music. At Zed we also have a requirement for female and local music content at 15% as noted on our Play Sheets in the studio.

3. Producing a RR show

Producing a show requires a few hours research and a little forward planning regarding events, potential guests or interviews available to you.

a. research

Appendix i lists a lot of local potential community groups and news resources you can use. You can often pick up newsletters and flyers at rallies that will provide good sources for stories (and keen interview subjects!)

You can also browse through the Press Releases tray on the Newsroom desk, or simply join the PR mailing lists of the various community groups you want to use as sources if you have good internet access. I subscribe to the PR list of The Wilderness Society, the Australian Council of Social Services, Brisbane Feminism Online, Queensland Environmental Activist Network and Animal Activism Queensland to name a few. A diverse range amongst RR producers will allow us to keep in touch with what is happening in the community sector.

Corporate newspapers we view with a critical eye and prefer to source our news from grass roots sources. That said, local newpapers from the quest group are often a good source of local community issues and events.

Some independent newspapers available in Queensland that can be useful include:

The National Indigenous Times

The Koori Mail (both available at newsagents in the Valley)

The Independent (QUT media students’ publication)

A list of useful websites is also included in Appendix i.

Mailing lists of various community groups – like the Friends of the Earth Events list, Brisbane Stop the War Collective, New Farm Neighbourhood Centre etc…..

News list-servers are also useful, Planet Ark World Environment News is one I subscribe to. Bear in mind the corporate biases of these newservers.

You can also subscribe to the Zed news lists ‘gnus’ and ‘news’ for sharing info and receiving PR

If you don’t want to subscirbe to the news lists you can view the archives here:

http://lists.4zzzfm.org.au/pipermail/news/

b. stories

As a general guideline stories you read out on air should be no longer than one page, an optimum size is four paragraphs (half a page). Longer stories can comprise a whole show if you combine a number of short related news items on a topic, interviews or a guest, or alternatively (if you have a lot of time) you can put together a pre-recorded ‘package’ if you have the necessary recording gear and editing software.

For a guide to the kinds of stories we do, look at the programme guide for each of our shows on the Zed website at www.4zzzfm.org.au

c. interviews & events

Guests and prerecorded interviews make your job easier. Community groups are often keen to get their issues on air and will be happy to come into the studio for a show, or do a pre-recorded interview. Guidelines for phone interviewing using the Zed recording booth at the station are included in ‘Technical Notes’.

When setting up in-studio guests, always have a contingency plan in case of a no-show.

d. community notices

We try to encourage listeners to go further than reacting negatively to the often bad news we report. This we perceive is one of the problems with mainstream media – there is never any easy way for people effected by issues reported to take action on them, especially as we live in a society that does not empower us to get politically active. Democracy requires a more politically active citizenry than a once-every-three-years-vote. So we try to include community notices to provide an avenue for action on the topics of interest to people around Brisbane and nationally. These events often include protest actions, rallies or fundraising events for community groups.

You can find them on the Zed website at: http://www.4zzzfm.org.au/services/index.cfm?action=dsp_community

If you come across any community events you think should be included, please forward them to us at <radradio@4zzzfm.org.au>

4. Technical Notes

a. using the on-air desk

All on-air announcers at Zed need to get trained on using the on-air desk!

The process at Zed require a two hour training session and a six months graveyard shift. This is to weed out people who want to have their own shows but may lack the commitment when it comes to the crunch. It makes sense because Zed has to be on-air 24 hours of every day so it needs reliable and committed volunteers. I can’t stress enough the importance of commitment to the continued functioning of the station.

In 2008 all new announcers have to go through the new announcer training process. If you eventually want to apply for your own show, you need to do the official Zed announcer training.

In reality, many of us have had much less training, notably Danni who took over the Anarchy Show with a 5 minute training session! Yay Danni! We can train each other during our shows, but a formal training session is still necessary.

To arrange a session of training and practice contact the Announcing Coordinator. Zed contacts are listed in Appendix iii.

It’s not as scary as it looks and an experienced announcer will supervise you.

All announcers are required to subscribe themselves the ‘announcers’ list-serv

On air process:

For every show you need to:

- prepare stories in advance;

- bring everything you need all ready to go – it is advisable to bring your own headphones and adapter

- select music (at least 10 cds for a one hour info show), takes about 15 mins-1/2 hour. we try to choose music relevant to the topic. there is a ratty red covered book in the CD library near the new releases that lists song topics.

- fill out in-studio forms: Play sheet & log book;

- play required sponsorship advertisements (in studio folder);

- mention the time, play or say station id. ie: “you’re listening to community radio 4 triple zed one-oh-two point one FM”

- read out community notices in last ten minutes of show;

- put away music & clean up your mess.

NB. the most important on-air advice I can give you is to always wear the headphones when you’re doing the desk: that way you can hear what is going out to air and quickly notice if you’ve failed to turn off the microphones or if your CD stuffs up.

b. phone & recorded interviews

Set up a time and date to interview your subject. You need to book the interview booth if possible by filing out the time sheet on the front of it. It is located back of the groundfloor and looks like a closet.

Often you may not be able to contact the authors of press releases. You need to bring your own disk and headphones are recommended. Prepare your questions beforehand.

Inside the recording booth you will find: headphones, microphone, telephone and three electronic gadgets. The biggest is the mini-disc recorder and the small one on the right hand side is the telephone transfer device.

How To Do it:

1. Turn on the fan.

2. put in your disk and press record+pause

3. choose a phone line and phone your victim

4. tell them you’re switching over to the recording device and then put on the headphones

5. press the ‘line in’ button on the phone transfer device and speak into the mike, asking your interviewee if they can hear you.

6. hang up the phone handset

7. tell them you are about to start recording when you are ready and press the pause button to start recording the interview – it’s a good idea to ask them to introoduce themselves and state their position/organisation. You can edit this bit off later.

7. double check that the counter is ticking over while you’re talking

8. say goodbye and switch of the phone transfer device. press stop on the MD recorder

You can easily cut off false starts and goodbyes in the booth mini disc recorder so you can use your audio on-air without further editing. Or you can take it home, record it onto your computer and edit further.

You need to write a ‘News Running sheet’ or other description so that others can use you audio on their shows. Include: title, date recorded, interviewer & interviewee, length. News running sheets can befound in the upright files in the newsroom.

c. editing audio

The Zed production studio uses Sony’s ‘Sound Forge’ software and Cool Edit Pro to edit audio. You need to book to use the Zed production studio, but it’s simpler to set up you home computer to do editing.

We recommend open source software, like ‘Audacity’. It can be easily downloaded from the net. We can provide you with a training sesh. Or tutorial guides to audio editing exist on the internet.

d. uploading interviews to the internet

We have been uploading a lot of our interviews to Radio4all.net or Radio.indymedia.org in recent years. This enables us to provide on-line content for other radio stations and for listeners visiting the Zed website. This way we have had our content used by a number of overseas stations and a few local ones too!

You need to edit your audio into segements of about 15 mins max and convert them to mp3s for uploading purposes. Instructions for uploading exist on the relevant sites.

e. recording your on-air show

If you want to record your on-air show you can use one of the on-air desk’s MD recorder. Alternatively, you can ask the Newsroom coordinator to allow you to access Zed’s logging files and you can download it to your computer as an mp3.

Appendix i – News Sources

These lists are by no means exhaustive, please feel free to send us links to add to this list <radradio@4zzzfm.org.au>

RADIO

www.radio4all.org

www.radio.indymedia.org

www.thewire.org.au The Wire

www.rtrfm.com.au/shows/indymedia Indymedia radio, RTR fm, Perth

www.3cr.org.au/program_list 3CRfm, Melbourne (Radioactive Show, Squatters Show, Alternative News, Anarchist World This Week, Earth Matters & more!)

www.2ser.com/podcasts 2SERfm, Sydney

www.araaustralia.org Alternative Radio Australia

www.alternativeradio.org US Alt Radio Show

www.radioproject.org US National radio project

www.democracynow.org US alt radio show

www.prx.org US Public Radio Exchange

www.cbaa.org.au Community Broadcasting Association of Australia

www.cbf.com.au Community Broadcasting Foundation (grants)

ALT MEDIA

www.sourcewatch.org - possibly the most important fact checking site you will need

www.indymedia.org Indymedia global site

www.indymedia.org.au/index.php Oceania Indy

www.infoshop.org Anarchist news

www.ainfos.ca Anarchist Info Service

www.newint.org.au new internationalist magazine

www.schnews.org.uk schnews

www.gregpalast.com independent journo

www.truthout.org

www.commondreams.org

www.zmag.org

www.corpwatch.org

www.grist.org

www.rabble.ca

www.adbusters.org

www.motherjones.com

BRISBANE & QLD NGOS

www.rac-qld.org Refugee Action Collective

www.barc.org.au Barc: Brisbane Actionweb for Refugee Collaboration

www.northeystreetcityfarm.org.au Northey St City Farm

www.bq.org.au bicycle queensland

www.dvrc.org.au Bris Domestic Violence Advocacy Service

www.brissc.com.au Bris Rape and Incest Survivors Support centre (BRISSC)

www.animalactivism.org

www.animalliberationqld.org.au

www.brisbane.foe.org.au Friends of the Earth Brisbane

www.environmentaladvocacy.org

www.foodirradiationinfo.or

www.spiral.org.au Spiral Community Hub

www.childrenbychoice.org.au Children By Choice

www.qccqld.org.au Qld Conservation Council – umbrella group of over 50 ENGOs

www.caa.org.au Oxfam Community Aid Abroad – contact Anne Matson

www.newfarmneighbourhood.org New Farm Neighbourhood Centre – contact Camille

www.glwa.org.au Gay and Lesbian Welfare Association

www.eccq.com.au Ethnic Communities Council of Queensland

AUSTRALIAN NGOS

www.asia-pacific-action.org

www.activistsrights.org.au activist rights

www.foe.org.au Friends of the Earth

www.amnesty.org.au Amnesty International

www.greenpeace.org.au

MASS MEDIA

No matter what you might have heard, the ABC is not unbiased!

www.abc.net.au

www.smh.com.au

www.couriermail.com.au

www.theaustralian.news.com.au

www.planetark.com/dailynewshome.cfm – planet ark World Environment News

www.ens-newwire.com

www.reuters.com

Tags:

October 15, 2008

knitting with equations

Warning: mathematics and knitting jargon follows.

One of my secret pleasures is knitting. Of late I mainly make beanies for my friends, but living in a hot climate means there’s not many opportunities to wear them.

I’ve been sticking to those that don’t need patterns, basic rectangles that wear as ‘ears’, pixie points with chinstraps for babies, the odd bit of Fair Isle. This week I knitted an interesting architectural beanie called ‘Folded Bloom’ for my mate Robin (obviously a fan of funny hats!) from a great book I got at the library “Folk Hats” by Vicki Square. A lot easier to knit than it looks, using only knit stitch and a little bit of counting, measuring and construction.

Possibly one of the most interesting things about knitting is the mathematical nature of the projects. Planning a new knitting project from scratch, if I haven’t made it before, I use graph paper for designing the outcome.

However, my simple projects pale in comparison to a whole world of mathematical knitters! The Mathematical Knitter Marie-Anne Belcastro designed a mathematical proof detailing why any topological surface can be knit. Her site is [here]

The Klein bottle  has many knitting applications including [beanie], [tea cosy] or object de art (links to knitting patterns). The Mobius strip is an obvious [scarf or cowl]. Boy’s surface hat, can be found [here] and a crocheted Lorenz manifold [here] complete with mathematical exposition. A hyperbolic plane can make a nice [pompom].

Fuzzy Galore has a simple explanation of how knitting can be used to solved multivariant polynomials an approach first discovered by [Ada Deitz] in the 40s. Fuzzy uses this equation to apply to a scarf:

(a + b)³ = a³ + 3a²b + 3ab² b³

(the results) come simply from doodling with the placement of the various elements. The basic idea is to define say ‘a’ as ‘knit’ and ‘b’ as ‘purl’, and a basic unit, in this case principally a=b=2 (rows). I knitted along, picking a different arrangement for the various elements each time. The result looks harmonious, while there are really no repeats of any pattern at all. …The only trick is that I varied how the same elements were arranged, and once I also changed scale, making a section where a=b=3 rows. So as not to lose track of what I was doing, I also visually separated each section with an 8-row garter stitch section, on the basis that it’s the special case a=b=1.  [pictures here]

Fuzzy also has some great patterns including [Ada Deitz patterns from polynomials], [Priscilla's Probability Pullover] and the [Fibonacci sequence] in a pair of socks. Here’s how Fuzzy applies the latter to knit a rib:

aaaa bbbb aaaa bbbb
bbbb aaaa bbbb aaaa
aaaa bbbb aaaa bbbb
bbbb aaaa bbbb aaaa
aaaa bbbb aaaa bbbb
aaaa bbbb aaaa bbbb
bbbb aaaa bbbb aaaa
bbbb aaaa bbbb aaaa
aaaa bbbb aaaa bbbb
aaaa bbbb aaaa bbbb
aaaa bbbb aaaa bbbb
bbbb aaaa bbbb aaaa
bbbb aaaa bbbb aaaa
bbbb aaaa bbbb aaaa

And there’s a whole biology stream of knitting I’ve yet to explore: DNA, various bodily organs. Reckon cells would make for challenging knitting. Looks like my knitting promises to get weirder and weirder…

See Mathematical Knitting for more inspirations http://www.toroidalsnark.net/mathknit.html

Tags:

October 14, 2008

a little atomic bomb

o, just give me a little atomic bomb
not too much
just a little
enough to kill a horse in the street
but there aren’t any horses in the street

well, enough to knock the flowers from a bowl
but I don’t see any
flowers in a
bowl

enough then
to frighten my love
but I don’t have any
love

well
give me an atomic bomb then
to scrub in my bathtub
like a dirty and lovable child

(I’ve got a bathtub)

just a little atomic bomb, general,
with pugnose
pink ears
smelling like underclothes in
July

do you think I’m crazy?
I think you’re crazy
too
so the way I think:
send me one before somebody else
does.

– charles bukowski

Tags:

September 14, 2008

Mandatory detention: the words have changed but the tune’s the same

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights states that:
Article 14.
(1) Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution.
And that
Article 5.
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.
and
Article 9.
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

In 1992 the Australian Labour government introduced immigration detention as a means of deterring so called ‘illegal’ immigrants from wanting to come to Australia. The Liberal government continued and strengthened this trend in immigration control, extending indefinitely the time in detention from a limit of 273 days.  In July 2008 the Rudd government has announced sweeping changes to the immigration detention regime:  but how much will it change?

The detention regime deligitimises the claims of asylum seekers by classing them as criminals, labelling them “illegal” and arbitarily imprisioning them for unlimited times. The regime is arbitrary, because ultimately a person’s detainee status is at the discretion of the Minister.

The effect of the regime has been widespread condemnation from the Australian community and globally for the ill psychological effects it has on the detained. Detainees, including many children, have been incarcerated for years at a time, without knowing when they might be released or deported. Depression and suicide have been commonplace and detainees regularly went on hunger strike and rioted within the centres, the most notorious of which was Woomera, in the South Australian desert (closed in 2003 after repeated protests).

A 2005 Inquiry found that immigration detention led to mental illness and another inquiry found that over 200 people who were Australian citizens had been detained wrongfully. Clearly the system was not working.

In July 2008 the Rudd Labor government declared an end to mandatory immigration detention, saying centres would only be used as a “last resort”.  However, in Chris Evan policy speech on July 29, 2008 he says that “Mandatory detention is an essential component of strong border control” and  “to support the integrity of Australia’s immigration program three groups will be subject to mandatory detention: …all unauthorised arrivals, … unlawful non-citizens who present unacceptable risks to the community; … unlawful non-citizens who have repeatedly refused to comply with their visa conditions;” continuing the criminalising language made infamous by Liberal Phillip Ruddock.

Is this really an end to mandatory detention and it’s deleterious effects? And what are the alternatives?

What is a detention centre? And why are they used?

Australia has a policy of mandatory detention for any person entering the country, or it’s territorial waters, without a valid visa.

Detention centres also known as ‘reception and processing’ centres for refugees fleeing there country of origin. Detention centres are places designed to hold refugees until there claim for refugee status is finalized. In recent years this has often been a long wait, due to the difficulty of establishing paperwork for people who have fled their homelands destitute, and some refugees have spent as long as 7 years in detention.

Usually in a detention centre it is over crowded and inadequately supplied for the sheer number of people arriving. There are currently 7 operational detention centres in Australia and a further 6 that have been closed down.

What is a refugee and why are they different from immigrants?

An immigrant is a foreign-born individual who voluntarily leaves his/her country of origin and has been admitted to reside permanently in Australia. While a refugee is a person who owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted for reasons of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion, is outside the country of his nationality, and is unable to or, owing to such fear, is unwilling to return to their country of origin.

The key difference then, is that an immigrant chooses to leave his/her country of origin.

A refugee, on the other hand, is compelled to seek asylum in another country. Refugees often have little time to prepare for their departure from their homeland and do not know when, if ever, they can return. They may be victims of war, having lost all their possessions. They may have been tortured, they may be ill.

While immigrants typically have prepared for their journey and often have support networks waiting for them in their new country. Immigrants can also return to their homeland without fear of persecution. They are usually in good health and have good job prospects.

What happens when refugees arrive in Australia?

Australia’s system is divided into two programs for refugees: offshore and onshore. The offshore program is where people apply for protection visas before they come to Australia. Most of these people have already been granted refugee status by the UNHCR (The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees ) and have been referred to Australia.

The onshore program relates to people who apply for a protection visa once they arrive on Australian soil.

Refugees apply for a Permanent Protection Visa (PPV) which is offered on both the onshore and offshore program. Often they are granted a Temporary Protection Visa (TPV) or Bridging Visa in the interrim which allows them to be released from detention, but often no commonwealth entitlements like health care, unemployment benefit or even permission to work.  For these reasons refugee advocates sometimes refer to TPVs as “secondary detention”.

Reasons for alternatives to detention centres

The conditions in many detention centers are of concern to human rights advocates. In many centres people are kept in overcrowded, unhygienic conditions, sometimes with convicted criminals. Staff are frequently inadequately trained and there have been incidents of active cruelty by staff members. Men and women are sometimes held in the same facilities while, conversely, members of families may be separated.

Lack of access to basic social services and to education has a negative impact on the physical and mental health of the persons detained. In many countries, children are detained without being provided an opportunity to go to school.

Detaining vulnerable persons such as children, people with mental or physical disabilities, torture or trauma victims, and women in the late stages of pregnancy or nursing babies, is morally unacceptable to many people.

Long periods of detention in particular leave scars on individuals who may have already suffered hardship and abuse prior to arriving in countries where they are detained. This may complicate their reintegration in society and in not a few cases lead them kill themselves.

The Australian Human Rights Commission in 2008 recommended that “there should be greater efforts to promptly release people in immigration detention onto bridging visas” and that detention should last no longer than four weeks.

What are the alternatives to detention centres?

Alternatives to detention centres have been proposed by many refugee advocates and are already being used in many countries. These include (taken from Practical alternatives to the administrative detention of asylum seekers and rejected asylum seekers, International Detention Coalition. 2008)

  • Supervised release of children and young adults to local social services: This alternative is practised in the United Kingdom.
  • Supervised release to an NGO: “an NGO which holds a contract with the authorities stating that they will supervise such individuals if provided with financial support from the State”. This alternative is already practised in the United States
  • Supervised release to an individual citizen – release on “bail”: “Individual citizens could offer to act as guarantors and take responsibility for the appearance of an asylum seeker at hearings and all official appointments.” As practised in Canada and the UK.
  • General restrictions on freedom of movement or place of residence: “asylum seekers are instructed by the authorities to reside in a certain locality or at a certain address, and if they fail to report regularly to the local police then they may be penalised by the withdrawal of social assistance”. Practised in Germany, Austria, Switzerland and Sweden.
  • Reporting requirements: “Asylum seekers can be asked to surrender their passports and other travel documents, and to report to the State authorities at regular intervals”. Practised in several European countries, including Denmark and France.
  • Open centres: “collective accommodation” where asylum seekers are free to leave, but must register and maintain a curfew. These centres are already in operation in Germany, Switzerland, the Netherlands, and compulsory in Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Slovakia, Poland and the Czech Republic. But “in many cases, however, these centres are situated in inconveniently remote locations (as indeed are most detention centres), and this in itself serves as a form of control on the residents’ movements.”

In Australia some trials of living in the community have been tried. The Department of Immigration currently advocates some Immigration Residential Housing and Alternative temporary detention in the community.

The Refugee Council of Australia notes that:

Residential Housing Projects (RHPs) were established close to major immigration detention centres where women and children could live while remaining in detention. While the RHPs were aimed at providing a more humane living environment, they came under strong criticism because there was little freedom of movement, 24-hour surveillance and husbands/fathers were not permitted to live at the RHPs.

Currently a lot of refugees released into the community after detention are cared for and supported not by the government, but by community support groups including church groups, refugee advocate organisations and charities.  They are supported primarily by the goodwill of the community.

Despite these initiatives, refugee processing still remains problematic.  Offshore and remote detention centres still isolate and make it difficult for asylum seekers to access NGO, social, medical and legal help.

Recently a group of NGO representatives visited the Christmas Island detention centre and found that:

The most striking experience of the visit was the high security, prison-like character of the new immigration detention facility. It is an extremely harsh and stark environment to detain people seeking asylum while their applications for protection are determined. The very expensive security systems of the facility are quite unnecessary for the population who may be detained there. There were many better uses for the $400 million the facility cost and the additional millions required for its upkeep even while empty.

The damage that has been done to people’s mental and physical health by detaining them in remote high security detention centres such as this has been documented repeatedly and is acknowledged by the government’s new immigration detention policy.

Despite the government’s rhetoric, in practice the punative nature of detention centres are very much still with us.

References:

Australian Government 2008. “Managing Australia’s Borders” at http://www.immi.gov.au/managing-australias-borders/detention/index.htm

Australian Government. 2008. “Alternative Detention Arrangements” http://www.immi.gov.au/managing-australias-borders/detention/services/alternative-arrangements.htm

Australian Human Rights Commision. 2004. “National Inquiry into Children in Immigration Detention” at http://www.humanrights.gov.au/human_rights/children_detention_report/report/chap06.htm

Bartlett, A.  2008. “The Terrifying Debate” at New Matilda http://newmatilda.com/2008/08/19/terrifying-debate

Cole, E. 2008. International Detention Coalition. “Practical alternatives to the administrative detention of asylum seekers and rejected asylum seekers” http://idcoalition.org/portal/content/view/118/76/

Edmund Rice Centre. 2003. “No Liability – Tragic Results from Australia’s Deportations” http://www.erc.org.au/research/pdf/1071789275.pdf

Evans, C 2008. “New Directions in Detention, Restoring Integrity to Australia’s Immigration System” Speech given to Seminar – Centre for International and Public Law, Australian National University. Online at http://www.chrisevans.alp.org.au/news/0708/immispeeches29-01.php

Refugee Council of Australia. “Alternative to Detention” http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/current/alternatives.html

Weber, P. 2003. “Alternatives to mandatory detention – a summary”. Refugee Action Committee, Canberra. http://www.refugeeaction.org/policy/summary.htm

“Christmas Island is not cool” http://www.crikey.com.au/Politics/20080818-Christmas-Island-detention-centre-is-not-cool.html

Thanks to Roland Stewart for inspiring this thought

Tags: